Alabama's subpoena to OpenAI asks a company under investigation to certify, under oath, the completeness of its own account of an autonomous system's conduct — before any court exists to test that certification.

29 House Democrats asked OpenAI to explain its agent monitoring after reports it had been disconnected during earlier tests. The question exposes a structural gap this corpus has already documented: a safeguard's own account of itself is not independent proof that it was active.

Meta's open-weight Muse Glimmer is exempt from AI Act technical documentation under Article 53(2). Two lawful thresholds later, no party is required to document the exact state deployed. SOURCE 0 seals it anyway.

Fourteen questions professionals ask about proving Medical Device AI (MDR × AI Act) compliance, mapped to the SOURCE 0 doctrinal vocabulary.

Anthropic's own review of a Claude access incident is credible — and, on its own, unfalsifiable by anyone outside Anthropic. This is the Endogenous Audit Paradox in its most literal form.